Prince Philip has heart surgery – Wants to return as deadly virus after he dies

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh

Psychopath

The Duke of Edinburgh, the 90-year-old husband of Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, has

English: Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, hus...

Image via Wikipedia

undergone successful heartsurgery for a blocked coronary artery, Buckingham Palace says.

The duke underwent an “invasive procedure of coronary stenting” on Friday after being taken to hospital with chest pains, the palace confirmed.

Editor:

Prince Philip must be kept alive, not because he’s important, but because of what he hopes for when he dies. “If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” – Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh

The Prince is one psychotic dude, like his friends and family.

Prince Philip’s principal collaborators in launching the WWF as a funding and worldwide operations arm of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, were Sir Julian Huxley and Max Nicholson, both ardent advocates of eugenics and racial purification. In fact, Huxley was president of the Eugenics Society when he co-founded the WWF. First, as head of the United Nations Educational, Social and Cultural Organization (Unesco), and later as a WWF founder, Huxley preached the need to revive race science and the urgent mission of “culling the human herd”–particularly of the darker-skinned races of Africa and South America. In the founding document of Unesco, Huxley had frankly acknowledged the difficulties he would encounter in reviving eugenics, in light of the Nazi genocide. “Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible,” he wrote, “it will be important for Unesco to see that the … public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”

The method Huxley and others devised for forcing people to “think the unthinkable,” was to replace the idea of eugenics with the idea of environmentalism. Huxley, Prince Philip, and the others, however, understood that, in their way of thinking, the two terms were interchangeable. During a 1960 tour of Africa, on the eve of the launching of the WWF, Huxley openly boasted that the ecology movement would be the principal weapon used by the British oligarchy to impose a Malthusian world order over the dead body of the nation-state system, and, most importantly, the United States.

There you have it, in plain English that any fool can understand. The environmental movement is a front for the “Eugenics Movement.”  The UN/UNESCO/UNEP programs are about “Death of Nation States and Mass-Depopulation”

Prince Philip hopes he returns to earth, reincarnated as a deadly virus, so he can inflict massive sickness and death upon the earth.

So, you can see why it’s so important to keep this psychopath alive as long as possible…..

In case Prince Philip isn’t reincarnated, the labs are working overtime creating the very deadly viruses the Prince dreams about.

THE ORIGINS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Only One Earth written with Dubos for the 1972...

Image via Wikipedia

Editor:

Take some internationalists and socialists with a desire to rule the world and they’ll come up with a plan on how to achieve their goal. Of course if they are allowed to succeed, We won’t have any more rights than a tree……..if we’re lucky!

BARBARA WARD AND THE ORIGINS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

In 1945, Barbara was asked to stand in Britain for Labour. She would not do so. But in those
days she spoke for Labour. Her espousal of bold government intervention, as with the Marshall Plan, and her link not only with British Fabian socialism, but with American liberalism – what Donald Tyerman called “a freer, Chester Bowles, Adlai Stevenson sort of world” – was never diverted but steadily modified by experience.

Transcending divisions: work for the Stockholm Conference Maurice Strong

Even before I met her, Lady Jackson, more widely known as Barbara Ward, was an important
influence on my life. She was the most articulate and persuasive champion of the poor, making
in her books and lectures a compelling case for the rich to be more responsive to the needs
of the poor. It was therefore with great excitement and anticipation that I first met her in Ottawa,
at the home of her friend, Tom Kent, Policy Advisor to Lester Pearson, whom she had come
to Ottawa to visit. At that time, I had just accepted the invitation of the UN Secretary-General
U Thant to organize the UN Conference on the Human Environment, to be held in Stockholm in
1972. I was preparing to leave my position as President of the Canadian International Development
Agency and was eager to seek Barbara Ward’s counsel on how to respond to the concerns of
developing countries that the newly emerging preoccupation of more developed countries with
the environmental issue would divert attention and resources from their overwhelming priority to
raise their people out of poverty through development.
This was clearly the most important challenge I would face in my new responsibilities for the
conference, and some key developing countries had already threatened to boycott it. I had
taken on the challenge because of my own conviction that concern for the environment and the
need to enlist the cooperation of developing countries in meeting this concern could give new
impetus to support for their development needs. I wanted to test my view with Barbara that
environment and development needed to be, and could be, mutually reinforcing.
When I met Barbara Ward in Tom Kent’s living room, I found her to be deeply interested and
responsive to this prospect. While she had not previously been active in the environmental
movement, she had a keen intellectual understanding and appreciation of its relevance to
developing countries. Her brilliance and enthusiasm ignited my hopes for the conference and
excited my spirits. This emboldened me to ask her for help. Her immediate acceptance gave
me the most effective and influential ally that I could possibly have had. For me, the prospect
of working closely with Barbara Ward was a dream come true.
The dream unfolded rapidly. Barbara designated her brilliant and resourceful assistant, David
Runnalls, to be the link between us. One of my first acts when I took over my new responsibilities
at UN Headquarters in New York was to seek her help in convening a group of influential leaders
of the development movement to consider how best to create a more positive synthesis
between development and environment. All were her disciples or admirers. With her convening
power, we met in New York in what was a first step in the long process of confronting the policy
and political differences that separated advocates of development from those of the environment,
which was the central theme of the Stockholm Conference and beyond.
The team that Barbara assembled to meet with me in New York included Gamani Corea from
Sri Lanka, Enrique Iglesias from Uruguay, Mahbub Ul Haq from Pakistan, and Jim Wolfensohn,
then an Australian investment banker and later to become President of the World Bank. With
Barbara’s help, we reached out to others to participate in our continuing dialogue, notably to the
Brazilian economist, Miguel Osorio de Almeida, the Polish/French development guru with broad
experience in Brazil and India, Ignacy Sachs, and Kuwait’s leading expert, Abdalatif Al-Hamad.
As Barbara was then living in New York, we met regularly with the continuing support of David
Runnalls. Most of all, I enjoyed and valued our one-to-one dinner meetings, always over a bottle
of her favourite indulgence, Dom Perignon champagne.

In parallel with the network Barbara helped us to develop, I enlisted the advice and support of a
visionary scientist, Carroll Wilson, then a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT),
who had already convened a pioneering study of climate change. He arranged a meeting for me
with his “Brain Trust” at MIT, which then guided my approach to the conference preparations. I was
delighted at the synergy between Barbara and Carroll Wilson. With their networks and leadership,
we prepared the intellectual and policy underpinnings for the formal programme of the conference
and translated them into the documents I submitted to the preparatory committee of government.

By according developing-country experts a primary role in our preparations, developing-country
representatives at the political level were reassured that their interests would be addressed –
and the movement to boycott the Stockholm Conference receded. The fact that Barbara was
now so clearly and visibly involved in the process was also extremely helpful to me in recruiting
the other star of the conference, India’s prime minister Indira Gandhi. She was a great fan of
Barbara Ward, and when she agreed to attend the conference and to allow me to make this
known, it gave the participation of developing countries new and much needed impetus. My
main colleague in orchestrating the increasingly extensive and complex network we were
developing with Barbara’s guidance was an extraordinarily talented and well-organized Swiss
development specialist, Marc Nerfin. He took the lead in organizing a meeting of key participants
in this network in June 1971 in the village of Founex near Geneva as the culmination of our
consultations. This spirited and often divisive dialogue produced a document articulating in
compelling terms the essential nature of the environment–development relationship as two sides
of the same coin. It made the point that the environment is both the basic resource for development
and a product of development, and that these two dimensions of the process must be brought
into a positive synthesis. The Founex Report proved to be a milestone in preparations for
Stockholm and the evolution of the movement we now call sustainable development.
The other milestone event in which Barbara’s role was central was the book I commissioned for the
conference, Only One Earth, co-authored by Barbara and René Dubos, the distinguished French
scientist then also a resident in New York. It seemed an unlikely combination of personalities, with
her extraordinary intellect manifested in a vibrant personality contrasting with his quietly authoritative
manner. When I first brought them together, they knew of each other, but had never met, and I
was apprehensive. However, their shared interests and mutual respect created an immediate
bond between them, which grew into a full partnership and an enduring friendship. The manuscript
was reviewed by a stellar group representing a variety of leading world experts. It became not
only the principal resource for the Stockholm Conference, but a best-seller in more than 12
languages, disseminating the main themes and messages of Stockholm throughout the world.
At the conference itself in June 1972, Barbara was the guiding star of the many non-governmental
organizations that for the first time were given a significant role in a United Nations conference.

Maurice Strong was Secretary-General of the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment
and of the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development (the Earth Summit).

BARBARA WARD AND THE ORIGINS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SETTLEMENTS

 

Vancouver, 31 May – 11 June 1976

D. Land (Agenda item 10 (d))

Preamble

 

1. Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Social justice, urban renewal and development, the provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole.

 

2. …Public control of land use is therefore indispensable to its protection as an asset and the achievement of the long-term objectives of human settlement policies and strategies.

 

3. To exercise such control effectively, public authorities require detailed knowledge of the current patterns of use and tenure of land; appropriate legislation defining the boundaries of individual rights and public interest; and suitable instruments for assessing the value of land and transferring to the community, inter alia through taxation, the unearned increment resulting from changes in use, or public investment or decision, or due to the general growth of the community.

 

Land Resource Management (a) Public ownership or effective control of land in the public interest is the single most important means of improving the capacity of human settlements to absorb changes and movements in population, modifying their internal structure and achieving a more equitable distribution of the benefits of development whilst assuring that environmental impacts are considered.

UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SETTLEMENTS

35 pounds of cocaine found in UN mailroom in New York

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , ,

by Ron Stephens

Having researched the UN and its ever-growing number of umbrella groups for years, I’m not surprised by anything at the UN. It’s not the cocaine that grabbed my attention

The UN headquarters in New York

Image via Wikipedia

while I read the article. This is what caught my attention “The cocaine was found in two sacks meant to look like genuine diplomatic pouches which are not supposed to be searched by security.”

The TSA is strip searching grandmothers, children and the disabled when they attempt to board a plane, yet a UN diplomatic pouch is off limits to security. Great way to move things like drugs or  bombs or maybe stolen sensitive documents. I suggest this only because the UN was created to slowly destroy the nation states of the world and bring about world governance. With a mandate like that, who would allow the UN to move anything anywhere without security checks?  The government. The same government that seems to be working day and night to remove your rights.

The UN is populated by  liars, thieves and deceivers who brought us the MMGW/climate change scam, the over population scam and a multitude of other scams and frauds. UNESCO uses the public school system they control to  “Green-Wash” the children.    It’s not the grandmother at the airport we need to be watching.

16kg/35 pounds of cocaine seized at UN’s New York HQ in mailbags from Mexico… after security staff spotted the dodgy logo

By Daily Mail Reporter

A shipment of 16 kilos of cocaine – with a street value of $2million (£1.3million) – which was crudely mocked up to look like a diplomatic pouch has been seized at the United Nations’ mail centre.

The white bag raised suspicions when it was being scanned at the New York building because it was stamped with what looked like a poorly concocted version of the UN logo.

The UN has insisted the arrival of the bag was a ‘mistake’ and that someone in Mexico, from where it said the bag was sent, would be ‘in big trouble’.

But online conspiracy theorists have claimed there is a cover-up – saying that the bag was in fact intended for a UN employee as part of an elaborate drug-smuggling scam.

Unconvincing: The cocaine was found in two sacks meant to look like genuine diplomatic pouches which are not supposed to be searched by security

Unconvincing: The cocaine was found in two sacks meant to look like genuine diplomatic pouches which are not supposed to be searched by security

New York Police Department spokesman Paul Browne, said the drug was in a white bag and there was no name or address on the shipment sent from Mexico City through Cincinnati.

He said: ‘It is my understanding that because there was no addressee, the DHL just thought ‘Well, that’s the UN symbol so we should ship it on to UN headquarters and let them figure out who it was supposed to go to.

Destination: The massive consignment of cocaine was headed for the UN's New York HQ until security intercepted it

Destination: The massive consignment of cocaine was headed for the UN’s New York HQ until security intercepted it

‘Somebody in Mexico is probably in trouble now, having let a significant amount of cocaine out of their possession.’

UN security officials called the NYPD and Drug Enforcement Administration after the shipment was intercepted on January 16.

Crude logo: Suspicions were raised when security spotted a fake United Nations logo stamped on the pouch which arrived at the New York HQ mail intake centre

Crude logo: Suspicions were raised when security spotted a fake United Nations logo stamped on the pouch which arrived at the New York HQ mail intake centre

UN undersecretary-general for safety and security Gregory Starr told reporters that ‘there is nothing to indicate that this had anything to do with anybody at the United Nations’.

He said: ‘This did not come from a United Nations facility. It was not, in my opinion, intended to go to a United Nations facility.

‘In my humble opinion, this was the work of narcotics traffickers that were trying to ship something into the United States and their plan must have gone wrong.’

He said the drug was actually stashed in two bags that were stamped with the sky-blue U.N. logo of a world map.

It was an apparent effort to masquerade as diplomatic pouches, which are not supposed to be inspected.

Inside the bag, the drug was hidden in hollowed-out notebooks.

The UN official showed journalists a photograph of the bags that were seized.

And he compared them with a real diplomatic pouch used by the UN, which is somewhat larger and made of a different material.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2092552/Cocaine-seized-UN-New-York-headquarters-16kg-diplomatic-pouch.html#ixzz1kp9ycSXK

The UN Deception – Freedom or Fascism

Police Rape Woman in Court House

Tags

, , ,

South Bruce OPP raped a woman at Walkerton Court House on Feb 10th 2014.

The SIU is still investigating the OPP at this time.

Raping women isn’t part of the OPP oath.

The oath or affirmation of office to be taken by a police officer, special constable or First Nations Constable shall be in one of the following forms:

I solemnly swear (affirm) that I will be loyal to Her Majesty the Queen and to Canada, and that I will uphold the Constitution of Canada and that I will, to the best of my ability, preserve the peace, prevent offences and discharge my other duties as (insert name of office) faithfully, impartially and according to law.

So help me God. (Omit this line in an affirmation.)

or

I solemnly swear (affirm) that I will be loyal to Canada, and that I will uphold the Constitution of Canada and that I will, to the best of my ability, preserve the peace, prevent offences and discharge my other duties as (insert name of office) faithfully, impartially and according to law.

So help me God. (Omit this line in an affirmation.)

Lets take a closer look at the oath – Could rape be included in “discharge my other duties” part of the oath?

 “I will be loyal to Her Majesty the Queen and to Canada” or “I will be loyal to Canada”

Which Queen are they taking the oath to? The one who swore an oath to uphold the law as per the KJV of the bible, or the one who is the personification of the Crown and at the apex of the legal and political systems?

Big difference as one is law and one is legal. Legal is not Law. Legal comes from legislative policy and is given the colour and force of law, but it’s not law. Legal is like law, similar to but not. Legal is corporate policy.

“I will, to the best of my ability”

Is this useful as an excuse? Take the rape at the Walkerton Court House as an example. Could the officer say something like..”I was just doing my job to the best of my ability and didn’t realize rape was wrong.”

“preserve the peace, prevent offences ”

When the officer raped the woman was he attempting to preserve the peace? Was he trying to prevent an offence or just doing his job to the best of his ability?

“offence”

Offence is an odd word as it shows in the editor as a wrong spelled word. Offence is not the same as offense..like legal and law. Offense is a law word (cause harm) Offence is like offense, similar to, like but not. Offense is in the realm of law and offence is in the world of legal. Law is law and legal is corporate fiction.

“according to law”

The most important phrase in the oath, “according to law” The OPP is a corporation as is Canada as is the Crown. They are in the legal realm which has nothing to do with the law. Remember legal is like, similar to but not law. Legal is corporate policy.

Therefore the OPP are policy enforcers for the various crown corporations and private companies that benefit from legislated policy .  Westario Power Inc. is a good example.

The tickets given you by OPP are not offenses, you caused no harm. They are offences, which are nothing more than revenue streams for the corporation. This is not law..it is theft of your property. Theft causes harm and is against the law.

“So help me God”

The Queen took an oath to uphold the LAW as per the KJV and so should have all OPP members. Law appears over 500 times in the KJV.  Legal appears 0 times in the KJV.

Ladies and gentlemen of the OPP you have a choice to make. Law or legal. Legal harms people by removing or restricting their lawful rights given them by their and your creator and that is against the law.

Be aware, when a man or woman has caused no harm, you have no authority or lawful right to interfere in lives. Please note -the driver’s license is a legal fiction and is not the property of the man or woman you pull over on the side of the road.

Please govern yourselves lawfully or you may find yourself  held privately liable for any harm you cause the good people of this province.

Remember…no harm no crime. That’s the law!

 

The oath or affirmation of office to be taken by a police officer, special constable or First Nations Constable shall be in one of the following forms:

I solemnly swear (affirm) that I will be loyal to Her Majesty the Queen and to Canada, and that I will uphold the Constitution of Canada and that I will, to the best of my ability, preserve the peace, prevent offences and discharge my other duties as (insert name of office) faithfully, impartially and according to law.

So help me God. (Omit this line in an affirmation.)

or

I solemnly swear (affirm) that I will be loyal to Canada, and that I will uphold the Constitution of Canada and that I will, to the best of my ability, preserve the peace, prevent offences and discharge my other duties as (insert name of office) faithfully, impartially and according to law.

So help me God. (Omit this line in an affirmation.)